« Blogs & Websites Build Author Platform | Main | Thursday Night Therapy and the Bad-for-You Platter »

April 30, 2008

Outrageous is In

As the month of May charges in, so does the hope of fresh, colorful flowers, a break in the weather and, yes, a successful sweeps week! In short, sweeps week means that television will go over the top with talk show hosts visiting all parts of creation (Where in the World is Matt Lauer?) or completely hyping up their program content (Dr. Phil will creep into Jerry-Springer territory and Oprah will take on Montel-like qualities). I’m sure shows like Grey’s Anatomy will feature even more sex, while the costumes on Dancing with the Stars will continue to shrink (if not malfunction). The rules during sweeps week are straightforward enough: Overly outrageous draws ‘em in.

So how can we writers turn the vibrancy of sweeps week into something useful? We can write outrageous (and I don’t mean “outrageously”, so don’t email me about the proper use of adverbs). We should write the outrageous into our every scene.

Recently, I began writing a scene in which my antagonist (a middle-aged, Botox-pumped gold digger) cooks up a pot of cyanide-laced chicken soup for her bedridden honey. After a deep swig of her midday scotch, she scans the kitchen for a large enough ladle to reach the bottom of the stock pot, in hopes of better dissolving the precipitous poison.

She dismisses the broomstick in the corner and reaches for her Sugar Daddy’s brass-handled cane. She dunks it in, stopper side down, and stirs like a witch agitating her brew. The only thing missing is the cackle and the howl, never mind the hairballs and dust bunnies likely stuck to the cane’s cork.

Does this character’s choice of stirring utensil affect the scene all that much? It does in two ways:
1. It enhances the outrageousness of the point of the scene which is to show the mental imbalance of a killer.
2. The scene becomes more memorable. You can bet the next time the reader sees someone walking with a cane, he/she will check out the bottom of it and imagine what might end up floating in a stew stirred with that particular walking aid.

I invite you, then, to weave the outrageous into your works, whether fiction or nonfiction, long or short, in-progress or complete. Take a look at what you’ve got and pump it up. Make it more dangerous, more devastating, more hilarious, or more bizarre. Go ahead. Create outrageous with the likes of Dr. Phil and Oprah. Better yet, follow in the footsteps of James Ellroy who once said, “I put on such a good show, the story is outrageous, and people don't want to hear that I'm basically a reasonable human being. As long as it continues to get me print, I'll continue to perform in an exuberant manner.”

Good luck adding exuberance. Let me know how it goes!

Posted by Judy at April 30, 2008 09:34 AM

Comments

Welcome back, Judy!

Your scene with the villain sounds great.

I have to say though that there is sometimes a fine line between outrageous and ridiculous. I just finished reading a thriller that definitely was into the ridiculous category. It was way over the top. Here's one example: Near the end of the book, his heroine is electrocuted. She has to be revived with CPR, but immediately afterward sees the killer with a knife, kicks it out of his hand, then stabs the killer. In an earlier scene, her house is doused with a tanker full of gasoline and explodes, but she manages to carry her lover (who weighs 100 lbs more than she does) out a second floor window and into a tree. And suffers no injuries.

I think we have to be careful to keep it realistic while at the same time push the limits. Not always an easy thing to do.

Posted by: Joyce at April 30, 2008 11:44 AM

Joyce, you are so right! I have read many outrageous scenes that were so over-the-top they were beyond annoying. One that stands out in my memory had an unrealistic climax in which a woman in heels chased down her attacker and knocked him out with something ridiculous like a tube of lipstick.

It's great to hear from you! I hope your writing is coming along well!

Best,

Judy

Posted by: Judy Schneider at April 30, 2008 01:28 PM

Hey Judy, so, so, so glad you're back! I understand what you're saying as I always try to inject some outrageousness into my work. But, yes it has to fit and in my opinion it has to be peppered in throughout. I love odd little details, things that make someone chuckle in a serious book or gives pause in a humorous one. I just crafted an outrageous scene for my WIP myself and I have to say, it has me chuckling. BUt as you know, my sense of humor is in fact, odd!

Posted by: kathie at April 30, 2008 03:36 PM

Kathie, so glad you stopped by! Your writing contains excellent examples of reasonable outrageousness. One of your characters, Bitsy, responded in a fresh and interesting way to just about every stimilus she encountered! I'm glad to hear you're still writing those quirky, outrageous scenes, Kathie. I look forward to reading them!

Best to you!

Judy

Posted by: Judy Schneider at April 30, 2008 04:39 PM

Yes, even a non-fiction garden writer utilizes outrageous.

"Peas, onions, lettuce, arugala, parsley and radishes have been sown. Maureen has a knack for choosing the perfect day. She also knows as soon as the soil is workable is a good time to get a few things in the ground. Besides what I already mentioned, she scattered flower seeds of bachelor buttons, larkspur, sweet William, and poppies. Poppies … poppies will make them sleep, now they'll sleeeeep. I apologize, but every time I hear, say, or read about poppies I have to do my impression of the Wicked Witch of the West.

Speaking of wicked, is it me or do y'all think groundhogs have gotten braver? Maybe they have in some areas because on the way home from Slippery Rock recently I saw one rummaging along the edge of Rt. 208, within feet of the pavement, just past the construction zone. It was heading towards Gray's Nursery, with purpose. I bet it knew about the tractor-trailer load of new plants that had just been delivered."

Posted by: TC Conner at April 30, 2008 06:55 PM

Judy:
I love the cane as a long-handled kitchen utensil! The only problem is that I take my 82-year-old mother to a doctor's appointment in Oakland tomorrow, and every time I look at her cane I'll be imagining your outrageous scene! And--my mother loves to cook, so I'll be even more distracted by the possibilities! Seriously, you mentioned using "the outrageous" in nonfiction. That's a great idea, and I'll have to give that some thought. This technique also has intriguing Brain-Stretch possibilities for camp! Great inspiration, Judy--thanks! mary

Posted by: mary at April 30, 2008 07:39 PM

Many thanks for your comments, Mary & TC. In nonfiction, it's particularly effective to write catchy, bordering-on-outrageous titles and subtitles to attract attention to your topic and create your own buzz words. I'd like to think we did that with words "Frantic Woman" in our book, The Frantic Woman's Guide to Life. As long as you use words and phrases that don't become obscure or require explanation, being outrageous in nonfiction can be fun (and time-consuming)! My advice: Grab a venti java with one hand, a thick thesaurus with the other, and create!

Mary, good luck with your mom and that cane. Hope she's not making chicken soup tomorrow!

Judy

Posted by: Judy Schneider at April 30, 2008 08:54 PM

I love it when I'm researching a topic and I discover something that is outrageous -- meaning outrageously true! Those are the details that can transform text that is purely informational into something more entertaining.

Posted by: Kelly Boyer Sagert at May 4, 2008 09:25 PM

Thanks for your comment, Kelly! I, too, love to uncover nuggets of relatively unknown information and sprinkle them in to a work in progress in order to more fully inform readers. In fact, just this morning I was reading the NYTimes online and found a fascinating article that opened my eyes in many ways.

To name one, I had read before about hospitals treating polio patients by wrapping the paralyzed legs with hot, wet blankets. Of course, I assumed the blankets were cotton. But the man featured in the article, Mr. John Welton, said he still shudders when he thinks of the smell of wet wool. Ewwww! Now, that's offensive and memorable and great stuff for bringing the reader in close enough for a whiff.

Here's the link for the article, one well worth reading: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/05/nyregion/05assistant.html?_r=1&ref=todayspaper&oref=slogin

Let me know what you think!

Thanks,

Judy

Posted by: Judy Schneider at May 5, 2008 09:33 AM